Sunday, April 29, 2012

Choices

Imagine having 3 job offers.  (No, this is not an exercise in fantasy.  In the not-so-distant past, we're talking the late 90s and earlier this century, multiple job offers were a regularly occurrence.  Remember?)  The offers are identical in nearly every way.  The job is the same.  The money -- both base pay and bonus potential -- are identical across the 3 jobs.  Benefits are also the same in each job.  The commutes, while different, are virtually identical in terms of time, distance and degree of difficulty.  And while the job offers are from 3 different companies, the work place itself is nearly identical.  Same office, same work space, same physical environment, same coffee and tea.

So, how do you decide which job offer to accept?  More specifically, what is the first thing you'd want to know before making The Big Decision?  What would be the next most important piece of information you'd need?  What type of information would come third?

Take a moment to scribble your answers.  Be as honest as entirely possible.  Don't be shy to admit even the most potentially embarrassing things that might enter into your decision-making process.

[Insert musical interlude here.  And, no, not the Jeopardy theme music.  Something with soul.  I'm thinking Tower of Power's Knock Yourself Out.]

Now class, let's consider another scenario.  Imagine that you are a manager in a company.  You've been looking for the ideal candidate to fill an important job in your department.  This person will work directly for you.  You have 3 finalists for the job.  They are identical in nearly every way.  They have the same education, the same work experience and identical skills and abilities.  Their resumes are essentially identical.  Their references are all equally stellar.  They each present themselves with equal professionalism -- both in clothing and presence.  They each speak with equal eloquence.  As best as you can tell, they all have the same potential to do the job brilliantly.  You won't go wrong with any of the 3 candidates.

So, how do you decide which person to offer the job to?  More specifically, what is the first, most important thing you'd need to know before making The Big Decision?  What would be the next most important piece of information you'd need?  What type of information would come third?

Again, take a moment to scribble your answers.  Please be as honest as entirely possible.  Don't be shy to admit if age, gender, physical attractiveness, ethnicity, religion, politics or other factors are important to you.  We're looking for truth and, yes, we can handle it.

We ask one last favor:  Please send your answers to alan@schnurconsulting.com.   Your input will be invaluable as we finalize a research effort to study these two questions.

And, yes, we have a number of specific hypotheses that this research will help address.  Either proving us right -- brilliant, actually -- or, perhaps, completely out to lunch.  Or both.

Speaking of brilliant, we urge you to check out a marvelous new feature of Shazam:  LyricPlay.  Tag a song, which is already a near-miraculous capability, and then select 'LyricPlay'.  Shazam provides the lyrics, verse by verse, synchronized with the music.  Absolutely fantastic!  Yet another example of our technology being more advanced than on Star Trek (save for replicators, transporters and warp drive, that is).

If you don't have Shazam, get it.  Then use the app to identify any song you're listening to.  Press 'LyricPlay' and sing along.  When you do, be grateful for the marvelous age in which we live.


Sunday, April 22, 2012

The Season of Deliberate Acts of Kindness

Welcome to our favorite time of year: The 2012 Season of Deliberate Acts of Kindness.

What, you haven't heard of The Season of Deliberate Acts of Kindness (or, for us professionals, simply The Season)? Say it ain't so! How could this possibly be? Have you been living under a rock for the last six months? Been floating aimlessly on a raft in the middle of the ocean with no WiFi? (Horrors!)  Marathoning The Wire, Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Weeds? Avoiding all opportunities to hear news of the world? (If so, you've missed a ton.) Been in a coma?

Regardless, you clearly missed the declaration that The Season of Deliberate Acts of Kindness began this year on April 22 at your sunrise. Which means, of course, that The Season has begun. Welcome!

What is The Season of Deliberate Acts of Kindness you ask? Our initial response: Must we explain everything? Our secondary response:  Best to go slow with certain people.

The Season is that time of the year when we are called upon to seek opportunities to demonstrate friendliness and generosity. Key concepts of The Season include:
  1. Finding opportunities to be friendly, generous and/or considerate
  2. Demonstrating friendliness, generosity and/or consideration for others, and
  3. Repeating steps 1 and 2 until the end of The Season.  And beyond, if you're truly cool.
The list of possible deliberate acts of kindness is endless. But since it's The Season, and we're in a helping mood, let us provide 20 useful ideas if only to stir your creative juices:
  • Holding doors for others (heard this from us before?)
  • Helping those less mobile cross the street
  • Thanking those who work with or for you for all they do
  • Reconnecting with a long-lost friend
  • Donating to a charity, any charity
  • Slowing down to allow someone to merge into traffic (If you're the recipient, remember to wave!)
  • Sending flowers to your mother (she'll love it)
  • Sending flowers to your father (he'll dig it)
  • Calling a member of your extended family just to say 'hi' (Call us old school -- we know you will -- but texting does NOT qualify here as an act of kindness!)
  • Giving your car and the Earth a break by taking public transportation or riding a bike a day or two each week
  • Planting anything
  • Bringing coffee or tea to a stressed co-worker or, yes, even your boss
  • Being polite to telemarketers (They're people too. Really, they are.)
  • Greeting people with a hug
  • Giving a buck to that guy you avoid eye contact with every day on the street
  • Calling or hugging your kid(s), just because
  • Joining a museum
  • Volunteering, even if only for an hour
  • Calling to offer support, even if only emotional, to that friend who you know needs help
  • Being polite to fans of opposing sports teams (Like telemarketers, they, too, are people.)
That's just 20 possibilities. Add your own flair, your own creativity. Find ways to help and support others, to make people around you feel better, to honor the contributions of those with whom you work, to add a bit more joy to the lives of friends, family and, given the season, strangers. Find ways to relieve the burden on the environment. Provide assistance -- time and/or money -- to organizations striving to feed, educate or inspire others. Be genuinely polite, even warm and appreciative, to those who have impossible jobs.

The season of Deliberate Acts of Kindness has begun! Start today to spread happiness with verve, determination, and passion. Remember, with any luck what goes around will come around.

One last and important point:  No end date for The Season 2012 has yet been set.  With any luck, it will continue straight through to the beginning of The Season 2013.  With any luck, that is.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Questions

In honor of the just-ended Passover celebration during which four questions are asked to help understand the holiday (leave it to us Jews to need four questions to understand a holiday!), TJOW offers these pressing questions for your consideration and entertainment:

65. Why don't more companies -- especially those in competitive industries -- operate like successful sports teams? It's curious to us that while many organizations invoke sports analogies frequently, most fail to operationalize one of the most valuable lessons from successful teams: Top teams help all of their players achieve outstanding performance. That's every coach's job. On top teams, that's also a responsibility of every player. They don't wait while one of their players, or one of their colleagues, performs at a mediocre level, watching to see if he or she will magically improve. They don't provide veiled, nebulous 'feedback', hoping the individual will 'get it'. They don't wait for failure before acting. Winning requires that every player performs at a high level. Top teams simply can't afford a bell-shaped performance curve. Why do many companies think that they can?

66. Has Yahoo! become People magazine? Is The National Inquirer their aim? Just some of the topics recently headlining on Yahoo! (and we quote verbatim from the home page):
  • Adopted Boy's Sad Story
  • Pregnant Athlete in Olympics
  • Man Surprised With Dream Backyard
  • Niecy Nash Meets 47-year-old Virgin
  • Megan Fox's Body Art Mystery
  • $5 Million Elevator for RV
  • What Kate Beckinsale Reads Her Daughter, and, not to be missed
  • Pitt and Jolie Are Engaged.
We're not kidding. We're afraid that if we were to look harder we would find these choice stories:
  • Baby Born With Two Heads Accurately Predicts Future
  • Bathroom Makeovers of White Collar Criminals
  • Separated At Birth: A Kardashian Secret
  • From Truck Driver to Surgeon in Weeks
  • Aliens Visit Me Regularly and Block My Driveway
  • Ten Things Never to Say to the Pope, and
  • Planning for the End of the World.
With performance suffering at Yahoo!, we have a modest suggestion: Think content. Just one of a series of idea we have for turning the company around.

67. Speaking purely from an evolutionary standpoint, are we made for work?
And when we say 'work', we're thinking what most of us do: Getting up at a prescribed time, putting on clean clothes, going to a specific place of work, confining oneself for the better part of 9 hours (with breaks and lunch) to a carefully-designed and overly-controlled environment where one does a set of tasks usually defined and monitored by someone else, and then leaving at a prescribed time, taking the trek home and doing it all again the next day. Usually for insufficient reward.

Were we made for that? Hardly. We were made, at least the males among us, to do what most men have done from the very beginning: Hunt. That's what we know. That's what we're good at. Slice into our DNA (carefully, please) and you'll find that hunting is at our core. Because unlike our current concept of 'work', hunting allows one to wake up whenever, eat a hearty breakfast to last through the day, gather weapons, pack a lunch, pick up your buddies and set out for a day far away from the rest of the community, away from the reproachful eyes of others. Yes, way back when we had to produce food or everyone died. There's that. But in all other respects (save for the actual killing of animals, that is), it's nearly perfect. And you wonder why guys, to this day, feel 'right' when they're hanging with their buddies, drinking, trolling bars, talking sports and acting like fools. It's who we are. [Tongue somewhat in cheek.]

68. Why don't more companies trust their people to do what's right? A cynical question? Possibly. But we would argue that the true sign of trust is the absence of rules at work regulating behavior. That is, an organization that truly trusts its people to do what's right is an organization without rules mandating what's right. Show us a company without a lengthy employee handbook defining just about every aspect of workplace behavior and we'll show you a company that puts full faith in its people to do the work well. One such company: Netflix. We cite them because the company has no policy regarding paid time off. Shocking but true, Netflix does not track vacation time. Their approach: Take it when you want and take as much as you need. Their belief: Our people will do what's right because they're smart, responsible and care about the company. We find that refreshing. We also believe that's good business.

Question 67 and 68. Take that, Chicago.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Divorce, Corporate Style

An article in Sunday's New York Times discussed the many and varied behaviors cited as cause for divorce in the U.K. The 'malicious and repeated serving of tuna casserole' was one. Insisting that a wife dress as a Klingon and speak in Klingon was another.

Let's be clear: In many places tuna casserole itself is a capital offense. Serving it maliciously and repeatedly is a crime of such unthinkably heinous proportions that divorce is just the first logical outcome. Banishment from civilization is no doubt the next. (Not to worry, Mom. You never served it maliciously. Repeatedly, yes. Maliciously, no.) The Klingon thing, on the other hand, actually seems reasonable. Unless, of course, the wife was of Romulan descent. Then we're talking trouble.

Tuna casserole and the Klingon empire not withstanding, our interest in divorce this week is not specific to the matters of the heart in personal relationships, but instead in the matters of the heart between an individual and her or his employer. We know all too well that for the vast majority of us a strong, emotional bond is created with the company in which we work. It's not unlike love, though HR folks typically refer to it as 'commitment'. This bond, this love if you will, can be an intense one, causing us to commit enormous energy and passion to our company. It causes us to do things we wouldn't consider doing under other circumstances. Like working late into the night, coming in on weekends, seeking creative solutions to the most nagging problems, obsessing about ways to make our work perfect.

And not because we're told to act this way. Because we want to. Because we care. Because we love what we do and love for whom we do it.

This is the stuff money can't buy. Too bad, then, that a company would do anything to jeopardize this bond, much less do things that might break it. Because once broken, the next step is Divorce, corporate style: The departure of often terrific talent.

This week, let's focus on those in the Tuna Casserole category:

Isolating and/or alienating those with a 'different' leadership style. This is a particularly insidious form of conformity-seeking behavior that squelches creativity, limits individual differences (so much for diversity), and undermines performance. We've seen this happen to inspired individuals, often in the mid-management ranks, who have achieved outstanding performance through their people -- precisely how we define 'leadership'. We can spend hours bemoaning the need for conformity at work or why conformity becomes mandatory. (Think difficult economic times.) Suffice it to say that when conformity is mandated -- especially when it hadn't been mandated before -- passion and commitment are damaged. Divorce, corporate style, often follows. Because who wants to stay in a relationship where freedom and creativity are constrained?

Tightening of the approval process. Another common outcome of a challenging economic climate, and one occurring in many organizations, is the dreaded tightening of the approval process. And when we say 'approval process', we're talking about anything requiring money: Travel, new equipment (even when it's essential to the job), and, among others, hiring. Not that limiting spending is inappropriate, mind you. It's the reduction of authority that accompanies approval tightening that's the culprit. Because when one's authority is reduced -- or perceived to be reduced -- the natural reaction is to wonder if trust from above is also diminishing. And when trust is thought to erode, you're in for trouble. Or more accurately: Divorce, corporate style. Especially among those who you can least afford to lose: Your most committed, passionate, talented staff.

Our strong suggestion: Avoid both of these practices at all costs. They'll suck the passion right out of your best people. They'll undermine performance. They'll quell the commitment, the love. And the result will be the eventual departure of top talent. Divorce, corporate style. It's like serving tuna casserole maliciously, only worse.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Stuff We Learned At Work

Bring together a group of people who have been working for a number of years and ask them what they have learned on the job. Once you get past the standard on-the-job skills training many receive, you're bound to hear some frightening things. We certainly did. Here's a sampling of verbatim quotes:
"Where I work it's been made clear that we're to keep our heads down, do our job, and not bother even thinking about new ways to do things."
"Take no risks! Where I work, failure is a fire-able offense."

"No one says it directly, but we know that thinking outside the box is for people above our pay grade. If them."

"The only answer that's acceptable where I work is 'Yes'."

"New ideas are seen as criticism. You definitely don't want to be critical where I work."

"No one knows what 'outstanding performance' looks like. We think they [management] want it that way because they can control who gets the highest ratings."

"See a problem? Where I work, it's better to ignore it."

"Working long hours is much more important then getting the job done quickly."

"Trust no one. There's no value in it."
And, no, these aren't disgruntled workers. These people were randomly selected to describe their experiences at work as part of a larger research effort. All have worked for their present employer for at least 5 years and claim no immediate desire to leave. Even so, it is clear that these people -- like the vast majority of management and non-management workers throughout this country -- have been taught behaviors that inhibit or even prohibit top performance at work.

So, what are these performance-inhibiting behaviors that many companies teach their people, whether overtly or otherwise? Our data, supported by other applied research, indicate that a majority of workers learn over time that:
  • Creative, elegant solutions are really not desired
  • Failure is bad and to be avoided at all cost
  • It's far better to agree than to disagree, especially with a superior
  • Effort (long hours) is valued far more than efficiency (getting the job done quickly)
  • Speaking your mind can be quite risky and potentially fatal, and
  • Receiving the highest performance rating is almost impossible. So why try?

It's no wonder, then, that when companies decide to attack long-standing business issues they often have to create completely separate teams and isolate them -- shield them, actually -- from the rest of the organization. Apart and far from the maddening crowd, so to speak. Where the old rules don't apply. A skunkworks project, as one good example, is one in which a small, loosely- or non-structured group of people come together to seek sometimes radical innovation. Not surprisingly, the first thing that's required when such a team is formed is to convince the players that:

1. Open communication is acceptable. Really.

2. Leadership does seek creative solutions. That's why we're here.

3. There is a strong possibility that leadership will, indeed, act on the ideas that emerge from the group.

Said another way, members of skunkworks projects -- we call them Design Teams -- have to unlearn what they've been taught at work and accept that there's a different way of doing business. Especially if innovation and performance improvement are the goals. This unlearning process often takes weeks. Reorienting people's thinking to include the possibility that leadership just might be interested in new ways of doing things can be quite difficult. That's a tribute, in a truly perverse way, to how effective the company's teachings have been.

It's sad, but true. If you need validation, ask your people. Maybe they'll tell you.

The behaviors companies teach their people typically prove costly. Greater efficiencies go undiscovered, chronic problems remain unsolved, worthy ideas are jettisoned without consideration, performance plateaus, initiative is squelched. Along the way, souls are damaged if not fully crushed, especially among those who are passionate about helping their employers succeed.

We can't imagine that this is part of a company's business model. You think any company anywhere makes the conscious decision to pay millions of dollars in payroll, benefits, and fringe benefits with hopes of reaping only a portion of that investment? We doubt it. Even so, our data estimate that, on average, upwards of 15 - 20% of potential, tangible, real-deal bottom-line performance gains are never realized. Our guess -- like those of their employees -- is that companies simply aren't interested in excelling. Their performance and the economic times being so good, of course.

Ah, but it does not have to be this way. Behaviors can be unlearned. Companies can teach new, more enlightened ways to lead, inspire and involve their people. Innovation can become the norm, not the exception. Continuous, profitable growth can be achieved and sustained.

And what's exciting about this is that your people hold the answers. They are eager to show you a new path forward. We can show you how to unleash those ideas. You, your customers, your share- and stakeholders -- and your people -- will be thrilled you did.